thezensite
Vowing Peace in an Age of War
| home |
thezensite
Vowing Peace in an Age of War
|
|
Alan Senauki
Hozan Alan Senauke is a Soto Zen priest and a disciple of Sojun Mel Weitsman Roshi in the tradition of Shunryu Suzuki Roshi. He serves as Tanto or head of practice at Berkeley Zen Center in California. Alan lives at BZC with his wife, Laurie, and their two children. Since 1991 he has been a leader of Buddhist Peace Fellowship, working with BPF and others as a socially engaged Buddhist activist and advocate.
In another realm, Alan has been a student and performer of American traditional music for more than thirty years. His new album on Native & Fine Records is entitled, Wooden Man.
From a talk given at the International Symposium on "Dogen Zen and its Relevance for our Time," 1998, Stanford University, sponsored by the International Soto School.
The Wide World Is A Meditation Hall Institutional Buddhism has been conspicuously ready to accept or ignore the inequalities and tyrannies of whatever political system it found itself under. This can be death to Buddhism, because it is death to any meaningful function of compassion. Wisdom without compassion feels no pain. . . The mercy of the West has been social revolution; the mercy of the East has been individual insight into the basic self/void. We need both. They are both contained in the traditional three aspects of the Dharma path: wisdom (prajna), meditation (dhyana), and morality (sila). Wisdom is intuitive knowledge of the mind of love and clarity that lies beneath one’s ego-driven anxieties and aggressions. Meditation is going into the mind to see this for yourself — over and over again, until it becomes the mind you live in. Morality is bringing it back out in the way you live, through personal example and responsible action, ultimately toward the true community (sangha) of “all beings.” This last aspect means, for me, supporting any cultural and economic revolution that moves clearly toward a free, international, classless world.[4]Tetsugen Glassman’s calls us to a great meal with all hungry beings. His vision is as wide as the six worlds: offering meals to those on the streets, teaching zazen to those needing spiritual nourishment, feeding the countless hungry ghosts. Hungry ghosts are within and all around us. Tetsugen takes his students out into the bitter city streets so they may begin to feel what it is like to be homeless. Homeless people are not other than ourselves. He draws together people of many faiths to bear witness on the killing grounds of Auschwitz, where the hungry ghosts of victims and killers are still crying out to be seen and reconciled. This is Avalokitesvara hearing the cries of the world and preparing to bring others across. It is the essence of the Bodhisattva’s four methods of guidance: giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and identity-action. I hear the patient voice of my own root teacher, Sojun Weitsman, whose subtle and dogged peacemaking is at once quiet and deeply challenging. Talking with his senior students recently, Sojun Roshi said that wherever there is human suffering we should first help people, including ourselves, before we find fault with systems and organizations. (Although such systems really may need to be changed.) Dogen calls forth the principle of “practice-enlightenment.” What I have learned about practice-enlightenment from Sojun is that enlightenment and character development are not two, that wisdom and morality insist on each other. This is also a radical notion. It gets to the root of how we practice in the world, saving beings. Political, social, and economic systems consist of human beings. Even as I confront structures that perpetuate great harm I try to see all the people who co-create these structures. I am compelled to recognize and admit my own ability to harm, so my own heart of wisdom and compassion may open more easily. I have studied Sojun persistently working away at this truth for years: building a diverse sangha in Berkeley, helping to heal old wounds at San Francisco Zen Center, and drawing a wide circle to link Soto Zen in the East and West. These voices and others weave through my dreams. Each in his or her own way makes the case that peace, or non-conflict, calls for independence, interdependence, and vow. The political expression of this dharma position is non-cooperation and non-complicity with any system or government or corporation that causes harm and impedes harmony, even when that system attempts to hide itself and delude us with privilege and spectacle. The dream of peace and the practice of peace arise in war and conflict. In every age, war compels people to cover our hearts and act in unimaginably cruel ways. No other animal is capable of such cruelty. A hospital or an embassy is bombed. Those responsible shrug their shoulders. “An accident,” they say. Landmines and booby traps are seeded across the land. Civilians do most of the dying. Homes are systematically destroyed. Refugees are driven across borders at gunpoint. Women are targeted for rape. I could be speaking of a dozen places around the world right now. Particular details, the color and shape of victims, heroes, and perpetrators, the landscape itself would differ, but the face of war is always ugly. Victims need our help. So do the perpetrators. “Because there is the base, there are jewel pedestals, fine clothing.”[5] This is Shakyamuni Buddha’s great teaching of Dependent Origination: Because this is, that is. In an age of war this is an encouraging fact. Because there is war, I know there is also peace. But if we think of peace as something that can be described and held on to, if we create a concept called peace and cling to it, conditions for war arise. What can we do? Dogen teaches that there is a peace beneath and beyond our ordinary notion of peace, and that zazen is simultaneously the door to this peace and its expression. The work of Zen and the dream of peace are not different. Conflict naturally arises in the material world, but we humans turn conflict into suffering with our egos, ideas, and attachments. The dream of peace is the Bodhisattva’s first vow. “Beings are numberless; I vow to save them.” Or as we chant at Berkeley Zen Center, “Beings are numberless; I vow to awaken with them.” Numberless beings include oneself and all others. Saving them means sharing the Dharma, helping each being realize him or herself. In a material sense it means feeding, sheltering, clothing, healing, comforting, listening, reconciling, practicing. At times it means organizing and protesting. If other beings go without, my own comfort and realization are incomplete. We play music together with our lives. If one life is out of tune, the entire composition is off, no matter how brilliantly anyone in the orchestra may play. And yet, the essence of musical harmony, of peace, of Zen practice is that each person plays, acts, and sits for herself. Peace is how we joyfully accept difference and interdependence. The practice of peace is being upright in each moment, zazen. Dogen writes: “Zazen is not learning to do concentration. It is the dharma gate of ease and bliss. It is undefiled practice-enlightenment.” (Fukanzazengi)[6] Being upright in peace can actually be done in any posture; one finds one’s place in any state of mind, even in the terrors of war, the rigors of wounds and disease, the nearness of death. Our dharma friend Rick Fields died recently after enduring four years of cancer that spread from his lungs throughout his body. Speaking of his struggle in a Tricycle interview, he said, “I don’t have a life-threatening disease. My life is threatening my disease, in that it is keeping the disease from taking over. I have a disease threatening life.” [7] In Rick’s final moments he chanted a verse of refuge and liberation. These were his last words. This is an example of being upright. Giving Let me offer three approaches to Buddhist peacemaking: Giving, Fearlessness, and Renunciation. The essential practice of peace is giving, dana paramitta. Giving one’s attention, friendship, and material aid. Giving and spiritual teachings, community, and organization. Giving is the first perfection and the first of the Bodhisattva’s four methods of guidance. It includes all other perfections. In Bodaisatta Shisho-ho Dogen advises us that: "Giving" means nongreed. Nongreed means not to covet. Not to covet means not to curry favor. Even if you govern the Four Continents, you should always convey the correct teaching with nongreed. It is to give away unneeded belongings to someone you don’t know, to offer flowers blooming on a distant mountain to the Tathagata, or, again, to offer treasures you had in a former life to sentient beings. Whether it is of teaching or of material, each gift has its value and is worth giving.[8]Giving begins with oneself. I give myself to practice and practice offers itself to me. In my search for peace and liberation there is always the smell of war. That begins with me as well. The taste of tears, corrosive doubt, decay fall within the circle of my own body and mind. The war is here, right where I hide behind a mask of self-attachment, a shelter of privilege, cutting myself off from others. True giving is receiving the gift of zazen mind and passing it to others in words and deeds. We offer gifts and guidance in many forms. Dogen’s four methods of guidance in Bodaisatta Shisho-ho — giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and identity-action — expand on the Buddha’s own teaching of peace and the Foundations for Social Unity,[9] the sangaha vatthu: dana, generosity; piyavaca, kindly speech;atthacariya, helpful action; and samanattata, impartiality or equal participation. At the heart of these teachings is the understanding that peace is making connection. On a simple level, material goods are given. On a higher level, teaching is shared. And on the highest level, there is just connection, the endless society of being, the universal congress of Bodhisattvas. In The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property Lewis Hyde describes dinner in a cheap restaurant in the South of France. The patrons sit at a long communal table, and each finds before his plate a modest bottle of wine. Before the meal begins, a man will pour his wine not into his own glass but into his neighbor’s. And his neighbor will return the gesture, filling the first man’s empty glass. In an economic sense nothing has happened. No one has any more wine than he did to begin with. But society has appeared where there was none before.[10] The gift itself is only a gift so long as it remains in circulation. If one is a monk or nun, one carries an empty bowl from house to house, or one sits in the zendo with bowls arrayed before one. The bowl is emptiness, yet in this material world food is offered so that one may live. Emptiness and form interact and dance. Having eaten, the monk or nun, transforms food back into action and practice, turning it back into the emptiness of interdependence and connection which is again offered to all beings, and the dance of peace continues. When we really embody the Bodhisattva vow to save all sentient beings then zazen is a quiet and transformative gift. We receive it in gratitude from buddha ancestors and from our all too human teachers, and we pass it on. Again Lewis Hyde: I would like to speak of gratitude as a labor undertaken by the soul to effect the transformation after a gift has been received. Between the time a gift comes to us and the time we pass it along, we suffer gratitude. Moreover, with gifts that are agents of change, it is only when the gift has worked in us, only when we come up to its level, as it were, that we can give it away again. Passing the gift along is the act of gratitude that finishes the labor. The transformation is not accomplished until we have the power to give the gift on our own terms.[11]During the recent NATO bombing in Serbia, a friend of mine proposed that the U.S. offer an four year university education in the United States — including here at Stanford — to every Serbian and Albanian youth of military age. This would provide them with intellectual and technical tools for peace, and would be much cheaper than the billions of dollars spent on weaponry and death. The United States (through its proxy the United Nations) has imposed bitter sanctions on Iraq for nearly a decade, and bombing so steadily for the last year that it is no longer news. Nearly a million children and elderly people have died for lack of medicine and food. The shops are bare, the pharmacies are empty. What if we offered the people of Iraq all the food and medicine they require? What would we lose by following a policy of generosity rather than a policy of threat and violence to the innocent? What would the political effects be; what karmic result would arise? Again, it would be a lot cheaper than the military option we are pursuing. I know these may be seen as naive proposals. They fail to reckon with the power of arms dealers, the greed of corporations, and the fears of politicians that are sold as truth to ordinary people. But why not dare to be naive? What is there to lose in speaking a obvious truths? Can we skillfully speak the truth of Dana to those in power, a way that they might finally open their eyes to pointlessness of war? There is always a path of peace. Fearlessness The practice of peace is fearless. Again this comes back to Dana, giving and giving up. To give anything to an enemy or opponent, one must be fearless. There is a story in The Tiger’s Cave that has stayed with me for years. When a rebel army swept into town in Korea, all the monks of the Zen temple fled except for the Abbot. The general came into the temple and was annoyed that the Abbot did not receive him with respect. “Don’t you know,” he shouted, “that you are looking at a man who can run you through without blinking?” “And you,” replied the Abbot strongly, “are looking at a man who can be run through without blinking!” The general stared at him, made a bow and retired.[12] Ancient Jataka tales, themselves derived from even older Indian folklore, relate previous bodhisattva lives of Shakyamuni Buddha. Here fearlessness and generosity are inseparably bound up with each other. A prince offers his own body to feed a hungry tigress. A parrot quells a forest fire by shaking river water from his wings until the gods have mercy. A hare sacrifices himself to make a meal for Shakra, king of the gods, disguised as a beggar. Again and again, the Buddha-to-be-born gives his utmost effort and his life itself for the sake of other beings in need. Dogen writes, “...in the human world, the Tathagata took the form of a human being. From this we know that he did the same in other realms.”[13] Peace is not always quiet words and gentle demeanor. There is strength and sinew in it. I often think about Maha Ghosananda of Cambodia simply deciding to walk across his country in the midst of a violent civil war. At any moment his saffron robes could be refuge or target. I also think about Thich Nhat Hanh, whom Richard Baker described as “a cross between a cloud and a piece of heavy equipment.” I have met both these exemplary teachers and one can feel the steel of intention at the heart of their actions. In zazen we become intimate with all kinds of fear. We come to see that fearing death or great loss is not so different from fearing more humble events like meeting one’s teacher face to face or performing a new ceremony. Fear itself provides an opening into the unknown. If we make peace in awareness of our own fear, there is room for everyone’s fear to fall away and turn to respect. Renunciation A third element is renunciation or relinquishment. Of course it is also inseparable from giving. Dogen writes, “If you study giving closely, you see that to accept a body and to give up the body are both giving.”[14] InShobogenzo Shoji he tells us to “set aside your body and mind, forget about them, and throw them into the house of buddha.”[15] Renunciation is a difficult principle for Zen people. The path of Zen as it exists in the today’s materialist world gives mere lip service to renunciation — “Drop mind and body.” The second Bodhisattva precept is Not Stealing or Not Taking What Is Not Given. For people in the so-called developed world — American, Europe, Japan — this is almost impossible. Many of us, even priests, lead privileged lives in rich countries whose economies are built on stealing the limited resources of the earth and the labors of poor people around the world. The injustice of poverty and wealth is itself a kind of violence. Every time we ride in a car or in an airplane, every meal we eat in a restaurant, every high-tech consumer item we buy involves us in violence. Really, there is no way to step outside of this system. If each of us cultivates awareness of the links between consumption and violence, we can begin to make choices about what is of true value in our lives. Just at that point relinquishment, renunciation is possible. But our efforts need to go further. There is a Quaker saying: “Speak truth to power.” The truth is that global corporations and armed nations further theft and oppression in the world. Hiding behind the anonymity of brand names and flags, corporations twist the dharma principle of interdependence into a tool for manipulation and greed. Organized religion does little to uncover this sort of thing. In fact, it often profits from investments and indirect government support. So, our responsibility as renunciates is beyond individual relinquishment. We must link up with each other, in the sense that we are with each other and support each other in the zendo, to tear down institutions built on greed, hatred, and delusion, and to build new structures of liberation and spiritual value that belong to everyone, not just to presidents, generals, millionaires, and bosses. These new links and structures will take many forms. The circle of sangha can be a model for our workplaces and factories. Our civil society must be built on mutual respect and patience rather than money. I can’t say yet what any of this will look like, but I feel it is the responsibility of the Zen community, and all communities of faith, to be present right in the middle of things. Until we begin to let go of our desires, we can’t really listen or talk to others about peace. People at risk are attuned to hypocrisy. It is pointless to ask the poor and oppressed to make sacrifices while I preserve a life of comfort and privilege, while we unthinkingly support a nation of privilege. Giving up privilege — male privilege, white privilege, class privilege, national privilege — is the practice of renunciation in Socially Engaged Buddhism. Privilege is often easy for others to see in us, while we walk around in it blind. Opening our Dharma eye implies renunciation of privilege. From the privileged side this looks like sacrifice, but from the side of practice, it is simply letting privilege fall away out of compassion for others and ourselves. Suzuki Roshi wrote that, “Renunciation is not giving up the things of the world, but accepting that they go away.” An Army of Peace Shakyamuni Buddha tried to head off an impending war between the ancient countries of Magadha and Kapilavattu, home to his own Shakya clan. He tried logic and persuasion and, at last, he sat zazen under a dead tree by the side of the battlefield. Since it was very hot, (the king of Magadha) couldn’t understand why the Buddha was sitting under a dead tree; usually people sit under beautiful green trees. So the king asked, “Why do you sit under the dead tree?” The Buddha calmly said to the king, “I feel cool, even under this dead tree, because it is growing near my native country.” This really pierced the king’s heart and he was so greatly impressed by the message of the Buddha’s action that he could go no further. Instead of attacking, he returned to his country. But the king’s attendant still continued to encourage him to attack and finally he did so. This time, unfortunately, Shakyamuni Buddha didn’t have time to do anything. Without saying a word, he just stood and watched his country and his people being destroyed.[16] The Buddha failed to stop the battle because, as Dogen wrote, “The mind of a sentient being is difficult to change.” This failure must have caused him terrible grief, even as we grieve over the killing fields of our modern world. But his effort to make peace from his own mind-ground is a great lesson. Success or failure is not the issue. Our compassionate hearts and actions have effect beyond success and failure, even though we can’t always see the effect. Engaged Buddhists and people of all the faith traditions want to create a nonviolent army of peace. How many lives might have been spared in Serbia and Kosovo if we had provided ten thousand witnesses instead of billions of dollars of bombs? How many people would benefit if we stood up to corruption, violence, drug dealing in our own neighborhoods. The practice of “active nonviolence” includes bearing witness and peaceful intervention. In the midst of local, regional, religious, and national conflicts and wars, this peace army could replace armed soldiers, land mines, tanks, and jet fighters. A peace army’s tools would be ears to hear, words to share, arms to embrace, and bodies to place in opposition to injustice. This army would be trained in meditation, mediation, reconciliation, and generosity. Its discipline would include patience, equanimity, selflessness, and a deep understanding of impermanence. Its “boot camp” would be very different than our army or navy’s training, but every bit as rigorous. Its social organization would include supply lines of food and medicine and clothing that could be shared with others. A peace army might sit down on the battlefield, right in the lines of fire in order to save others, enduring the same danger as combatants and civilians. It is necessary to take risks in Zen practice. It is just as necessary to take risks in peacemaking. I think of this as a true expression of identity action: identifying with soldiers, guerrillas, and displaced people, identifying with the bombed and shattered earth itself. Is this suicidal? Maybe so. It is like the action of Thich Quang Duc, who publicly immolated himself in Vietnam in 1963, while his fellow monks and nuns were being targeted for repression and his nation itself was in flames. But peace is the point, not suicide. Samanattata or identity-action, as Dogen renders it, is the peace army’s rule of training. Nationalism, chauvinism, and conventional politics are rooted in separation and ego-identity, but identity-action means non-separation and interdependence. All beings have the same wish for happiness, comfort, and liberation. Whatever hatred I might see in my enemy or opponent exists simultaneously in me, sometimes as potential, and sometimes as an ugly presence. The same is true for the good.This understanding is not confined to Buddhism. It shines through the teachings of Jesus, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, who all preached love in the worst of circumstances. Bodhisattvas Walk Among Us During the short aeons of swords,Let us take our vows seriously and be Bodhisattvas. Respect our Zen tradition and buddha ancestors, but be truly accountable to all beings. Please bring peace and zazen mind right into the messy and grieving middle of the world. Watch your step. A number of people knowlingly and unknowlingly helped with the writing of this essay: Robert Aitken, Santikaro Bhikkhu, Laurie Senauke, Helen Schley, Greg Mello, Ken Jones, and Diana Winston. Nine bows to them and countless others. Notes 1. Eihei Dogen, from “Waka Poems” in Moon in a Dewdrop, ed. by Kazuaki Tanahashi, (Berkeley: North Point Press, 1985), 213. 2. Eihei Dogen, from “Bodhisattva’s Four Methods of Guidance,” in Moon in a Dewdrop, 46. 3. “Bodhisattva’s Four Methods of Guidance,” 45. 4. Gary Snyder, from “Buddhism and the Coming Revolution” in Earth House Hold, (New York, New Directions, 1969), 92. 5. Dongshan Liangjie, from “Song of the Jewel Mirror Awareness,” in Timeless Spring: A Soto Zen Anthology, ed. by Thomas Cleary, (New York, Tokyo: Weatherhill, 1980), 41. 6. Eihei Dogen, from “Rules for Zazen,” in Moon in a Dewdrop, 30. 7. “In Light of Death: An Interview with Rick Fields on living with cancer,” interview by Helen Tworkov,Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, (Fall, 1997), 105. 8. “Bodhisattva’s Four Methods of Guidance,” 44. 9. For a more extended look at “Bodaisatta Shisho-ho” and “Sangaha Vatthu” see Alan Senauke, “The Bodhisattva’s Four Methods for Steering Any Vehicle,” in Socially Engaged Buddhism for the New Millenium, (Bangkok: Sathirakoses-Nagapradipa Foundation, 1999). 10. Lewis Hyde, The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property, (New York: Vintage, 1983), 56. 11. The Gift, 47. 12. From “The Tiger’s Cave,” in A Second Zen Reader, ed. by Trevor Leggett, (Rutland, Tokyo: Tuttle, 1988), 160. 13. “Bodhisattva’s Four Methods of Guidance,” 46-47. 14. “Bodhisattva’s Four Methods of Guidance,” 45. 15. Eihei Dogen, from “Birth and Death,” in Moon in a Dewdrop, 75. 16. Dainin Katagiri, Returning To Silence: Zen Practice in Daily Life, (Boston, London: Shambhala, 1988), 16. 17. The Holy Teaching of Vimalakirti, trans. by Robert A. F. Thurman, (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1976), 70. |
| home |